“Doctrine is Important, But …”

“Doctrine is Important, But …”

In a culture that looks with skepticism about any claims of truth, it is not surprising that even in some Bible-believing churches there is little promotion of the need for doctrine.  The sentiment in many places seems to be, “Doctrine is important but …”

I heard a good sermon once where the preacher made that very comment, “Doctrine is important but …”  He never explained why it was important but quickly moved on. Later he told a story about his own growing rage at another driver.  In frustration, he wanted to stop his car, get out, and verbally, if not physically, pound the guy.  His candor was appreciated.  But he kept his cool, stayed in his car, and drove on.

I asked myself, “How did he know to move on?”  He applied so many positive aspects of Christian conduct: love your enemy (Matthew 5:44), be angry and do not sin (Ephesians 4:26), say “no” to ungodliness (Titus 2:12), get rid of bitterness and rage (Colossians 3:8), treat others the way you want to be treated (Matthew 7:12) and more.  All of these are Bible doctrines.  Although he said earlier, “Doctrine is important but …” there was no “but” about the need for it in that situation.  The application of Bible doctrine saved the day, not to mention possibly a fight or jail time!

Part of the bugaboo is the complexities of language. Language changes and words take on different nuances, and sometimes totally different meanings.  Many get the impression that doctrine is basically what churches and Christians fight about.  As long as Christians still sin, and our doctrine says we will, some of that will show up in misguided contentiousness.

However, we should not allow that to deter us from understanding what doctrine is.  Nor should we minimize the importance of intentionally presenting doctrinal studies in the work of the church.  That said, we need to be more precise in how we talk about it.  For years I have mirrored what I was taught about several New Testament letters, that the first part of them is about doctrine, whereas the last part is about how we live.  For example, I have taught that the first eleven chapters of Romans are about doctrine, what we believe, whereas the last five chapters are about life, how we live out Christ’s teaching.

I now believe that dichotomy is a misnomer.  The foundations of our faith (what we know intellectually), and the practical application of that understanding in life (what we do) are both Bible doctrine.  For example, without the Bible defining love, people can twist its meaning to engage in unspeakable sin.  On the other hand, to understand biblical love and then choose not to act on it is also sinful.  We need both understanding and application.

So, what is doctrine as it relates to Christianity?  In translation work, there has been a shift relative to using the word doctrine.  Whereas the KJV uses it 51 times and the NKJV 37, newer versions have shied away from it.  Representative examples are the NASV using it only 10 times, the ESV 11, the NET just once, and the NLT not at all1.  This coincides with what Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary indicates2.  Doctrine, which was once commonly understood to mean teaching or instruction, is now considered an archaic use of the term. That is why the newer versions have moved away from the word doctrine and replaced it with the words teaching or instruction.

The key biblical Greek words once predominantly translated as doctrine (didaskalia, didache) are defined as follows in BDAG3Didaskalia means “1. the act of teaching, teaching, instruction; 2. that which is taught, teaching, instruction.”  Didache means “1. the activity of teaching, teaching, instruction; 2. the content of teaching, teaching.

If we hang on to the archaic meaning of doctrine, we really need it. However, the word doctrine may carry an unwanted connotation to contemporary audiences of “what Christians fight about.”  So, if we use the word, we should define it to mean “the teaching and instruction of Christ.”

A prudent move may be to simply use the words teaching and instruction referring to that body of biblical knowledge that defines and directs our understanding and application of the faith.  The teaching and instruction of Christ, directly from his lips or through his inspired writers is of paramount importance.  Do we need an intentional and sustained focus on it in our churches? We will discuss that in our next blog so stay tuned.

Notes:

1KJV (King James Version); NKJV (New King James Version); NASV (New American Standard Version); ESV (English Standard Version); NET (New English Translation); NLT (New Living Translation).

2Merriam-Webster Unabridged. https://unabridged.merriam-webster.com/

3A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature.  Third edition. Revised and edited by Frederick William Danker.  The University of Chicago Press.

What’s a Body to Do?

What’s a Body to Do?

The church body that is.  Teaching biblical sexual ethics is an important step in curbing abortion.  In previous articles, we have noted that biblical sexual ethics, if applied, would end abortion among the unmarried.  The vast majority of abortions, around 85%, take place among the unmarried. The code of popular culture says sexual intercourse among the unmarried is acceptable.  What is often not stated is a mind-numbing follow-up assumption.   It says if an unwanted pregnancy results, abortion is a neutral means of birth control.   Nothing is said about taking a human life.

How can the church promote the positive aspects of sexual purity as an antidote to abortion?  Christ-centered churches that do not redefine Scripture to accommodate culture do a good job of standing firm for sexual purity.  They do not operate on the delusion that their church family can change all of society.  They do know that reaching people one by one will spare them the pain and guilt of abortion.  It will make a difference.

How can we do it better?  One of the complicating factors we face is caring for those who have already chosen abortion.  So many before coming to Christ have sinned without any knowledge of God’s will.  Others with a Christian background were spiritual infants who made sinful decisions due to their spiritual immaturity.  Still others, mature Christians, have made out-of-character choices, caving to temptations to have extramarital sex.

No one is exempt from sin, and we must always seek to either inform or restore people with compassion.  Sex apart from marriage is not unforgivable, nor is abortion. We must help people know a stand for sexual purity is not a condemning stand for anyone who repents from past sin.   Christ takes negative life events and uses them for good if anyone turns to support his truth in the present.  Finding the balance between uncompromising passion for moral truth and sensitivity to someone’s personal history is not easy.  Yet we must do so without compromise.

With that in mind, how can we do better at helping people buy into the wisdom of biblical sexual ethics?  This is the work of a lifetime in every church body.  I do not have all the answers, but I offer a couple of suggestions for consideration.

First, encourage your church leaders to do regular critical evaluations of how the church is teaching biblical sexual ethics.  I know from my own past experience as a minister how easy it is to get overwhelmed in the multi-faceted aspects of church life.  We can be floundering in one area and not realize it.  Scheduled periodic evaluation about whether, or how effectively, we teach biblical sexual ethics can help get us on track.

Each church will develop its own strategy for age-specific instruction, and for the frequency of workshops and classes.  Preachers will develop their own strategies for when and how to include sexual ethics in sermon plans for the year.  But busyness makes time seem to evaporate.  I was amazed at how often I would think I just spoke on a particular topic a year or two ago, only to discover it had been five!  If new people are coming into our church, we can’t wait five years before leading them to discover Christ’s plan for sexual health.  Let’s encourage our leaders to regularly evaluate our effectiveness in teaching sexual ethics.  An honest appraisal by strong leaders will lead them to generate good strategic plans.

Second, we must not let popular culture intimidate us from openly saying sex apart from marriage is a sin.  It misses God’s target for our lives.  People need to know what is right, but they also need to know what is wrong in God’s eyes.

Moreover, we must point out the positive nature of biblical prohibitions.  Every negative command in Scripture escorts us to a wonderful range of freedoms.  When people choose to abstain from sex outside of marriage, they are free to do what is right; free to respect the opposite sex in more satisfying ways than simply as objects for uncontrolled passion; free from contracting sexually transmitted diseases; free for both sexes to skirt the relational quagmire of unwanted pregnancy; free to see conception as the majestic moment when the completed genetic code marks the existence of a new person; and free from having to make a choice about abortion.   Most of all, it frees people to please God.

The Preventative Antidote to Abortion

The Preventative Antidote to Abortion

The abortion debate will rage on from state to state.  Those who believe that God created human life to begin at conception will not get equal time in most media outlets.  Those who focus on the mother’s right to terminate the life of her fetus are likely to get more airtime.  As noted in my last submission, over 85% of women who abort have become pregnant out of wedlock (1).  The 15% of married who opt for abortion is not the focus on these articles.  That is not to minimize their importance or the serious and complicated factors that may lead to their decision.  But the largest contributor to unwanted pregnancies is a view of sex which has come out of the Sexual Revolution.  It says sexual intercourse without a lifelong commitment to another in marriage is fine.

Two thoughts come immediately to mind.  One, large segments of our culture think sexual abstinence apart from marriage is an archaic notion and an attack on freedom.  In that regard many would consider someone who says, “Extra-marital sex is wrong,” to be narrow minded, unenlightened, and judgmental (2).  How to communicate ideas to people who dismiss our message and, therefore, shut off discussion by simply turning away is a quandary. After all, our conviction is based on the fact that we actually care about people’s well-being.

Although we may struggle to find the right approach, even given the mistakes we may make, we must still communicate the truth. Jesus wanted everyone to embrace his message, but he never hesitated to let people walk away because he told the truth (3).  The truth is what sets people free, not avoiding the truth for fear of people’s reactions.

Two, some would argue that stressing sexual abstinence apart from marriage ends up being nothing more than preaching to the choir.  In other words, only those who already hold to such a view of sexual ethics will applaud the message.  So why bother?

However, so-called preaching to the choir is crucial.  Scripture often tells us that without constant reminders we are prone to relax our standards or become anesthetized to the dangers of sin.  Sexual purity is not a given in the choir (i.e., among believers).  Google ‘sexual scandals in the church’ and you will find story after story of dedicated Christians who betrayed God’s design for sex.  The message of abstinence apart from marriage must be delivered regularly, especially to the faithful.

Believers must safeguard their own sexual choices.  But reminders of the importance of sexual purity encourages them to be the voice of Christ in the marketplace.  They have family, friends, and associates who may be influenced by their “salt and light” (Matthew 5:13-16).  This is the setting where many Christians have earned respect by lives well lived.  That respect translates into opportunities for people to listen to our message because they have come to trust us.

Some would object by saying, “Yes, but you can’t stop the wind from blowing.  People will have sex outside of marriage.  Get real!”  People are going to use opioid drugs.  Should we stop challenging people to avoid them?  People will drink and drive.  Should we stop urging them to change their behavior? Having sex outside of marriage often leads to sexually transmitted disease and a world of psychological or relational complications.  It also leads too often to unwanted pregnancy and abortion.  Restraint and self-discipline are the antidote to a major social crisis.

As far as getting real, I’m under no illusion that when we advocate sexual abstinence outside of marriage everyone will see the wisdom in that and comply.  Hardly!  Our desire is for everyone to see and apply what’s obvious.  Abortion becomes a non-issue when sexual restraint is exercised outside of marriage.  But I’m not naïve enough to think we can reach everyone.  The goal is not to reach everyone, but to reach some.   As Paul said about sharing the gospel, along with its implications for godly living, I have become all things to all people, that by all means I might save some (1 Corinthians 9:22 ESV).

Every person who catches the vision of the Bible’s preventative antidote to abortion is one more person spared from facing a life altering decision.  Conservative churches and Bible believing Christians do a good job of supporting biblical wisdom on sexual ethics.  Still, there are reminders and possible approaches that can help us do better.  Our next article will address some of these.

Notes:

(1)  See my previous post, The Abortion Crisis: A Root Opportunity at https://wordaliveenterprises.com/blog/

(2)  Many who conclude that we are judgmental tend themselves to be judgmental in their assessment of us and our position.  We must not allow accusations to move us away from our convictions.

(3)  See when many of his disciples walked away (John 6:66) because he told them the truth (John 6:26-59).

The Abortion Crisis: A Root Opportunity

The Abortion Crisis:  A Root Opportunity

Unless we live in a cave or have cut ourselves off from news outlets for the sake of psychological well-being, we face another time of national unrest.  This time it relates to the Supreme Court Decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and return abortion legislation to the states.

When cultural issues step center stage, where passions run high and division runs deep, the church can make a difference.  I don’t mean by advancing political policy but by drawing attention within its own ranks to the protective power of biblical truth.  Simultaneously we can sharpen our witness as we speak to people of all persuasions.

Aspects of the abortion issue have been and will be analyzed and debated, often with rancor.  However, I want to focus on the special opportunity the church has during this time.  Addressing the root issue leading to abortion generally receives little attention.   Promoting sexual abstinence for singles and sexual faithfulness in marriage for couples provides the cure.  The Bible has been right all along.

That will not be a focus among media outlets, nor in most of the halls of academia, and certainly not in television programming or movies.  The Sexual Revolution of the 1960’s in the United States launched a full-blown attack against biblical sexual ethics.  In succeeding years, the revolution largely took control of the popular cultural influencers in education, politics, and media.   The sexual boundaries of abstinence outside of marriage and sexual activity within marriage alone have been largely abolished and even mocked in popular culture.

Where has that led in relation to abortion?  According to the CDC (2018), 14.8% of those having abortions were married, whereas 85.2% were unmarried (1).  The NY Times cites the Guttmacher Institute, who defends “reproductive rights” in favor of abortion, as breaking these statistics down even further.  Of those having an abortion 46% are single and never married, 31% unmarried and cohabitating with a partner, 9% previously married and single, and 14% married (2).

In practical terms the vast majority of the over eighty-five percent of women in America who have abortions could escape the whole abortion quagmire.  They could avoid its cost in time and money, the pain or discomfort from the procedure, the relational upheaval that often ensues, and the mental anguish so many face afterwards.  By accepting a biblical ethic about sex and marriage, unwanted pregnancies drop from the landscape.

Some would argue, “Yes, but that is so unrealistic.  Unmarried people, teens and up, are going to have sex.”  That is so not the point.  The point is that many who do hear the biblical perspective and the overwhelming benefit of living it out, will embrace it.  The church must counter the deafening silence of culture about how the Sexual Revolution cheapened and devalued sex.

Christians with compassion and conviction must remind people of the unnecessary consequences that often accompany sex outside of marriage.  Sexually transmitted diseases are completely avoidable.  All of the relationships shattered by sexual unfaithfulness are preventable.  Exposing the truth that abortion depersonalizes a fetus as a disposable object when it carries the complete genetic makeup of an adult created in God’s image is vital information. These facts can be communicated in ways that project care and concern.  But people can’t hear unless others speak up.  Again, when culture is silent, or worse, applauds sexual misconduct as if it is perfectly harmless, we must speak up.

Fact: abstinence prior to marriage does away with unwanted pregnancy for singles.  Abortion is not needed.  Moreover, couples who enter a marriage covenant committed to sexual fidelity are far more likely to support the addition of an unplanned child. They do not balk at lifetime commitments or the love that conceived the child.  Those with a commitment to God are likely to see the unplanned child as God’s leading in their lives.  The unexpected conception is not bad luck nor impersonal fetal tissue.

The positive aspects of sexual abstinence while single, and sexual faithfulness within marriage are overwhelming.  In upcoming blogs, I will discuss this along with how Bible teaching is a not a restrictive prison house but a “can do” sexual ethic for both men and women in regard to true fulfillment.  I will share thoughts about how we can maintain firm convictions about sexuality and abortion balanced by gentleness, compassion, and forgiveness in our ministry to people.  So, stay tuned.

 

Notes

(1)  2018  Abortion Surveillance — United States, 2018

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/ss/ss6907a1.htm

(2)  Who Gets Abortions in America?  By Margot-Katz, Claire Cain Miller and Quoctrung Bui, NY

Times, Dec. 14, 2021.

Revelation: Facing and Winning Life’s Challenges

Revelation: Facing and Winning Life’s Challenges

I recently led a Revelation class via Zoom and am nearing the completion of a classroom study in my hometown.  Nothing compares to an in-person class setting for the quality of interaction between people. Yet the virtual class offers distinct advantages as well.  In our class, we had around ten participants, but among the ten, we had people from four different states.

This was my own presentation but we leaned on a commonly used title, Revelation for the Rest of Us.   I may change it to Revelation: Facing and Winning Life’s Challenges.  John’s original audience consisted of Christians at the end of the first century who lived under the threat of persecution.  Whether someone experienced it or not, Christians lived under the daily weight of knowing it might land on them or one of their loved ones.

There are many views of Revelation.  They are not created equal.  Some are highly popular, others are not.  Understanding Revelation, however, is not a popularity contest.  Our first goal is to wrestle with what the Lord intended to communicate through the apostle John.

Let me be quick to acknowledge the intelligence, sincerity, and faith of anyone who believes that Jesus Christ is the Lord.  If a preacher or teacher believes that Jesus will come again to judge the living and dead, and to reward his people with eternal life in a new heaven and new earth, then we agree on the most important truth.  If we disagree about what the right approach to  Revelation is or how the details play out, it is not to downgrade or put down other believers.  We simply agree to disagree agreeably.

If casual conservation is a barometer, the most popular view of Revelation is one that believes most of Revelation has not yet happened.  There is a gap approaching 2,000 years from the time of John’s writing in the first century until things kick in sometime in our future.  This view maintains that the events of chapters 4-20 are just around the corner but have not happened yet.  In other words, chapters 4-20 did not apply to the situation John’s audience faced.  Some believe this so strongly that to disagree is viewed as a sign of unbelief.  That is not true, but there is great passion among some about this.

My operating assumption is simple.  John’s audience lived with the threat of persecution.  They needed the whole book to apply to their situation.  They needed perspective on how to interpret their world.  Encouragement to stay faithful would play a crucial role when tempted to give in to the pressures they faced.  Convincing reasons for them to be willing to die for Christ if necessary were essential.  Constant reminders of their immediate reward upon death as well as their final reward in heaven would be the fuel to keep them going.  Interpreted from this perspective, we discover that chapters 4-20 are all about the circumstances and situations every generation of Christians must face, whether in the first, thirteenth, or twenty-first century.  It speaks to things we see all around us on a regular basis, confirming every day that Jesus knew what he was talking about.

Traveling down the road of this viewpoint means some of us find the book of Revelation just as convincing and convicting as ever.  But it also seems less confusing, more comforting, and less threatening.  I have heard so many Christians express their own fear about things to come based on Revelation.  Yet John’s audience lived with the possibility of persecution.  The last thing they needed was a book that gave them one more thing of which to be anxious or afraid.  My conviction is that the Lord gave them a book in which every chapter spoke to their situation, clarifying their understanding, sharpening their hope, and bringing comfort to their souls.  It can do the same for us too.

If the above does nothing for you, I get it. Some Christians whom I have respected the most have held the more popular view of Revelation.  If they are right, the Lord knows I am on board with however he works it out.  However, if you have been hesitant to get into Revelation, thinking it is a book that inspires confusion or fear, let me know.  For my distance readers, I would love to schedule a Zoom class.  For my Kokomo readers, we could do something locally.  In any case, if that’s you, drop me a note at [email protected].

The Great Tribulation? Yep, We’re In It

The Great Tribulation? Yep, We’re In It

I am currently leading two classes on Revelation.  The tragic war in Ukraine is reported on daily.  Between the two it is hard not to think of the Great Tribulation.

Embarking on any part of Revelation exposes you to potential criticism and censure.  Some, however, appreciate having their thinking challenged.  I will share and you can decide when it comes to the Great Tribulation.

A common view is that in the future the world will undergo a seven-year period of unparalleled suffering known as the Great Tribulation. Some believe the church will be taken out of the world prior to this, in the middle of it, or at the end of it.

With great respect for many dedicated Christian leaders who hold these views, there seems to be some obvious interpretation problems.  First, when the Great Tribulation is mentioned in Revelation 7:14, it never says it is seven years.  Some theologians do, but the apostle John did not.

Second, the idea of seven years comes from Daniel 9:20-27.  Daniel’s prophecy covers a period of 490 years.  However, some maintain that in the middle of verse 26 there is a gap of nearly 2,000 years and counting.  The first part refers to the crucifixion of Jesus, and the second part hasn’t happened yet.  Although Daniel does not say the prophecy is put on pause, some Christian thinkers do.  What that means is that instead of Daniel’s prophecy being 490 years, it turns out to be 2,490 years and counting. That’s a problem.

Third, Jesus predicted the prophecy of Daniel would be fulfilled in the Roman destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D.  Matthew 24:1-34 details that prophecy. Jesus applies Daniel’s prophecy to that moment, not our future (Matthew 24:15).  Jesus said that all the things discussed in Matthew 24:1-34 would happen in the lifetime of the disciples. We learn about direct address in grade school.  Jesus spoke directly to his disciples saying “you” will see these things some fifteen times.  The language of Matthew 24 makes some think Jesus’ words could not possibly apply to that generation but understanding history and prophetic discourse makes it plausible.  Jesus predicted that Daniel’s prophecy would be fulfilled in 70 A.D., not in our future.

So, if the Great Tribulation is not a seven-year period in the future, when is it?  First, we need to realize that Revelation is actually about the church age.  It was designed to give perspective, encouragement, challenges, and hope to Christians facing persecution.  Every chapter of Revelation is for the benefit of the Christian community in its present situation with a positive hope about the coming of Christ.  The book is much more practical than many think.

John is writing about “the last days.”  The last days in Scripture began when the church was born nearly 2,000 years ago (Acts 2:17).  It refers to the church age.  Revelation opens by Jesus saying he is revealing what will “soon” take place (Revelation 1:1).   This applies to every generation of the church.  Every generation of the church, including ours, lives through the Great Tribulation.

Stripping away the romanticism or mysticism surrounding the Great Tribulation, we need to think objectively about our world.  We live in a world where there is hatred, lies, murder, rape, theft, human trafficking, persecution, domestic violence, life altering addiction, demonic torment, mental/emotional/psychological anguish, false religion and philosophy, identity crises of many kinds, economic oppression, terrorism, disease, famine, war and more, more, more. If we put a global statistic to each aspect of human suffering, the world would collapse under its weight.

I have made over 4,000 hospital visits and 400 funerals in my time.  Yet, I have never heard a critical care patient or grief stricken person express interest or concern about the Great Tribulation.  The reason is simple: they were in it.  If things are going good at the moment, and if we close our eyes to the suffering around us, we can think that the Great Tribulation is yet to come.  Otherwise, it is obvious we are in it.

However, Revelation, gives us good news.  We are told those who join the multitudes in heaven have come (literally, are coming) out of the Great Tribulation (Revelation 7:9,14).  Regardless of how hard life hits us, if we are faithful to Christ unto death, we get to come out!

Praying for God to Remove a World Leader

Praying for God to Remove a World Leader

        Ukraine.  Invaded. Confirmation of the biblical view of mankind.  Philosophers, academicians, liberal theologians, and bright people in every walk of life often balk at the biblical view of people.  They see it as demeaning to argue that people are inherently sinful.  However, history continues to confirm it.  If righteous wars must be fought to oppose evil, it is only because lurking in the background is the evil to begin with.

In my church today we were called to pray.  We took time to pray and were encouraged to keep praying as long as it takes.  Godly people all over the world are doing the same.  There are so many aspects of this tragic war that need the prayers of God’s people.

We pray because we believe, for the God who created our world, who can move mountains, who raised his Son from the dead, and brought cleansing for our sin, there is nothing impossible.  That includes God’s ability to depose leaders.  In a prayer of praise Daniel said to God and about God, Praise be to the name of God for ever and ever; wisdom and power are his.  He changes times and seasons; he deposes kings and raises up others. He gives wisdom to the wise and knowledge to the discerning (Daniel 2:20-21).

God’s positioning of leaders on the world stage remains a mystery.  We often wonder why a dictator, or president, or prime minister, or king is allowed to rise to prominence when they rule with apparent ignorance or evil intent.  Yet God sees a bigger picture than our finite minds can grasp.  I try to remind myself that our brains, in spite of how wise we see ourselves, are smaller than a speck of dust in the cosmos and pale in comparison to the Divine Mind that created and directs our world.  God knows what he is doing.

So how privileged are we that God allows us to partner with him for change!  When God hears prayers that are off target, he knows our intent is good.  Even so, he is not obligated to bring change because of misguided prayer.  But more significantly, God calls us to pray because he designed a mechanism by which we can effect positive change for his glory.

A stunning picture is painted by John in Revelation of this truth.  An angel is given incense to offer before the throne, along with the prayers of the saints.  John then writes, The smoke of the incense, together with the prayers of the saints, went up before God from the angel’s hand.  Then the angel took the censer, filled it with fire from the altar, and hurled it on the earth; and there came peals of thunder, rumblings, flashes of lightning and an earthquake (Rev. 8:4-5).

The picture is profound.  The prayers of the saints go up to God’s throne, and the answers are thrown down to earth with jaw-dropping power.  Our prayers have God-given power to change our world.

So, if God can depose rulers, is it appropriate for us to pray that he do so?  He certainly has a lot of tools at his disposal.  In a democracy he can use elections; in other forms of government, he can use revolution; it can come as the result of war; it come can through stroke and heart attack; it can even come through a leader’s change of heart.  But is it appropriate to pray for a leader by name, along with likeminded successors, to be deposed?

I admit it.  Since the start of this war, I have prayed that very thing.  I am hoping many who haven’t, will consider joining me.  Evil men with evil intentions do evil things to millions of people.  It seems more than appropriate to pray for the God who deposes kings to consider doing so now.

No prayer of this kind should be offered presumptuously.  For something as simple as travel plans James reminds us that we should pray, If it is the Lord’s will, we will live and do this or that” (James 4:15). With something as important and consequential as deposing world leaders, the spirit of our prayers must be, If it is the Lord’s will, this will happen.

I am praying for God to depose those leaders who orchestrated this dreadful atrocity.  I will, of course, accept God’s perfect understanding of what I cannot see, as well as his timing and decisions.  But pray I will!

Proud of Everything About God: No Exceptions

Proud of Everything About God: No Exceptions

I was privileged a week ago to speak at the Denbigh Christian Church in Newport News, Virginia.  It is a strong church and in many ways like a second home with some of our family members in the church along with friends made over many years.

For three months the church used my book, Letters to Grow On: Instructions for New Christians, as a springboard for Bible sermons and for use in their weekly small group meetings.  I was honored to preach a wrap-up message for this series.  I could pick a topic from any of the last three lessons in the book.  I chose lesson 50, The Kindness and Sternness of God.1

How well do we know God?  Are we proud of part of his nature, like his great love, but embarrassed by other parts, like his anger or justice?  If we truly know God, I mean really know him, we will be proud of every single aspect of his nature and character.

Our reaction to God’s nature is brought into sharp focus by Paul in Romans 11:22.   He contrasts the Old Testament people of God, Israel, with the New Testament people of God, the church.  Both entered covenants with the Lord.  Israel, however, broke the covenant by persistent unfaithfulness and ultimate rejection of the Messiah, Jesus, God’s Son.  There are consequences for behavior.  Paul indicates that Israel was cut off from God’s blessings and the hope of eternal life.

Furthermore, God doesn’t play favorites.  He indicates that Christians can suffer the same fate unless we stay faithful to Christ.  Paul writes, Note then the kindness and the severity of God: severity toward those who have fallen, but God’s kindness to you, provided you continue in his kindness. Otherwise, you too will be cut off (Romans 11:22 ESV).2

How does that aspect of God’s character make you feel?  Embarrassed or proud?  First, we must understand what Paul means by severity (ESV, NASV, KJV, NKJV, NLT), sternness (NIV), or harshness (NET).  It does not refer to a lack of compassion or to indifference about people: God loves people beyond imagination!  God’s severity refers to an inflexible commitment to the rightness and appropriateness of divine law. Our God stands for what is right! That should make us proud.

The oft quoted response is, “Yes, but how can a good God send people to hell?” That question misses the point.  If anyone ends up in hell it is because they chose a lifestyle that leads there.  That is not on God.  I repeat, that is not on God.  God doesn’t want anyone to be cut off from his promises (2 Peter 3:9).  Rather he took the extreme personal measure of allowing his Son to be crucified to take away the sins leading to judgment (1 Peter 2:24).  This is good for anyone who accepts Christ and lives in harmony with his new covenant (Hebrews 8:6-13).

What the severity of God means is that because he has an inflexible commitment to the rightness of divine law,3 those who want the freedom to rebel against his righteousness will not populate heaven.  If God allows those who want to murder, rape, lie and steal into heaven; if he allows those who refuse the steps to break addiction to drugs, alcohol, or sex into heaven; if he allows people who love retaliation, slander, and gossip into heaven; if he allows those who don’t want to trust and obey him – well, heaven will end up being the same ugly mess we have now.

My heart breaks for people who choose a road that leads to hell.  My entire adult life has been devoted to helping people find Jesus Christ and enjoy the heaven he promises. But I am proud that God will not allow heaven to be ruined by those who would bring sin into it.

When reading what the Bible says about hell or judgment, it is interesting to note that whether sharing the gospel for the first time with people, or instructing the Christian community, the early Christians never register embarrassment about his severity.  The real truth is they knew God well enough to be proud of him for that.  In fact, they understood that his severity is actually the ultimate kindness for we who practice faithfulness to Christ.  God simply will not allow heaven to be spoiled by those who love sin.  For that, I am proud of God!

1Letters to Grow On: Instructions for New Christians, pp. 136-138.  [Go to the resources link for more information].

2ESV = English Standard Version; NASV = New American Standard Version; KJV = King James Version; NKJV = New King James Version; NLT = New Living Translation; NIV = New International Version; NET = New English Translation.

3See Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, Vol. VIII.  Edited by Gerhard Friedrich, translated by, Geoffrey W. Bromiley.  Wm. B. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1972. Pp. 108-109.

The Conundrum of Daily Bible Reading (Part 3)

The Conundrum of Daily Bible Reading (Part Three)

      I have a hopeless sweet tooth.  If I order Italian dressing, I always put a packet or two of sweetener on my salad.  If you are thinking, “Oh gag,” I get it.  What makes us people is that we are people – a lot the same, and lot different.  So, when it comes to daily Bible reading, it is impossible to pour Christians into the mold of one size fits all.

Still, in America we are those “to whom much is given” (Luke 12:48).  Of the 7,378 languages in the world, 3,883 do not have the Scriptures in their own language.1  In contrast, Bible Gateway puts over sixty versions of the Bible in English at our fingertips with a computer keystroke.2  Parts of our world live in biblical poverty; we are wealthy beyond measure.  If we can read, we have a responsibility to get into and stay into God’s word.

What follows are merely suggestions.  Not all of them will apply to everyone, but hopefully some of us will find ideas that motivate us to minimize the conundrum. 

Just do it!  Many of us just need to commit again to daily Bible reading.  Each time we get out of the routine, then recommit, that is a victory.  Focusing on failure rather than grasping the opportunity anew is counterproductive.  Start reading and feel good about it! If you hit a snag, don’t beat yourself up.  Start over again.  Just do it!

Choose a Readable Version.  Some Bible versions are designed to read easier.  A practical guide for determining the reading level of various Bible versions can be found at Christianbook.com.3  Some of the smartest people I know like the New Living Translation, yet it is rated at a 6th grade reading level.  Other versions like the New American Standard are rated at 11th grade, the English Standard at 10th grade, the New International at 8th grade, and the King James at 12th grade.  Regardless of your reading level, pick one that reads easily for you.

Follow a plan.  If you plan to read the whole Bible in a year, there are good plans you can follow for each day’s reading.  A clear direction always helps.  Do an online search or ask a Christian friend to help you find a reading schedule.  However, don’t assume that you must read through the Bible in a year.  That is a great goal, but if you want smaller portions for daily reading, select a Bible book and the number of verses you want to cover daily.  Slow and steady often wins the race.

Remember study is reading. A percentage of Christians prefer to do their own Bible study, digging deeper than a surface read.  That might be as a student learning from a good Bible teacher, as a Bible teacher yourself, or independently for personal benefit.  The vast majority of my own Bible reading has come through Bible study.  One of the conundrums we discussed is the need for someone to guide our understanding.  It is hard to think about reading what we don’t understand.  Sitting at the feet of gifted teachers, like the disciples at Jesus’ feet, still required me to read the Scriptures we were studying.  The same is true if I am preparing to teach.  Some argue that Bible study does not qualify as daily devotion in Bible reading, but I can’t find that verse in Scripture.  It most certainly does.

Stretch it out.  The Psalmist meditated on God’s word day and night (Psalm 119:97,148).  Meditation isn’t moving on to a new passage every day but reading the same Bible passage or Bible truth daily, either literally or in your mind.  To memorize Scripture, we have to read and recite it many times to get it cemented in our minds.  Taking a passage heard in a sermon or class and reading it daily throughout the week, thinking through its implication for life, is still reading and is powerful!

You can read the Scriptures and not know God.  Wrong conclusions drawn from Scripture or a purely academic approach does not lead to knowing God intimately. But for people of faith, we recognize that God speaks directly to us through his word in personal and powerful ways.  Getting into the word is not an intellectual exercise but a personal encounter with the living God in which we get to know him more completely.  Let’s think of ways to do this daily!

1https://wycliffe.net/resources/statistics

2https://www.biblegateway.com

3https://support.biblegateway.com/hc/en-us/articles/360001403747-What-are-the-reading-levels-of-the-Bibles-on-Bible-Gateway-

See also … https://christianbook.com/page/bibles/about/bible-translation-reading-levels

The Conundrum of Daily Bible Reading (Part 2)

The Conundrum of Daily Bible Reading (Part 2)

I have known him for decades.  He is a dedicated Christian man, loving Christ and the church.  He is also a former minister.  He decided he would read through the Bible entirely in 2021.  And he did!  Many Christians embark on such a journey with varying results.  Some complete it; in fact, some do it annually.  Others begin and get bogged down.  Almost two years ago I told my family I planned to read through the entire Bible in 2020 beginning in January.  By the end of May I reported I had made it through Genesis!  Ugh!

There is no command in Scripture calling us to read through the Bible in a year so failing to do so is not an act of disobedience.  But somehow, when you set such a noble goal and don’t complete it, you feel like you let the Lord, the angels, your best friends and even the dog down.  So, a hearty well-done to my Christian brother who stayed with it.

However, my friend said something that resonated deeply with me.  This seasoned and biblically literate Christian man said, “There were so many places in the Bible that seemed confusing and impossible to understand.”  Because he’s a close friend, he continued, “I told myself repeatedly, ‘Gary I need your help,’ but I couldn’t keep bugging you.” Even this mature Christian needed guidance to understand portions of God’s word.

The Bible itself recognizes this conundrum.  An Ethiopian who was in charge of all the treasury for Candace, the queen of Ethiopia, had gone to Jerusalem to worship and was making his way home.  The Lord sent Philip to meet this man.  As he approached his chariot, Philip overheard him reading from Isaiah.  This was a prominent, well educated, literate man of faith with the means to possess the scroll of Isaiah.  Philip asked him if he understood what he was reading (Acts 8:26-30).

The Ethiopian official’s response is enlightening.  “How can I,” he said, “unless someone guides or instructs me?” (Acts 8:31 ESV, NLT). Philip did not say, “Keep reading the prophecies daily and you will get the hang of it.”  This man needed a teacher.

Everyone’s story is different, so I would never say what works for me is how everyone should grow in God’s word.  But I can say that the greatest stimulus to spiritual growth for me over the years came from teachers who helped me understand the Scriptures.  Classes on Old Testament history, Acts, Romans, the Life of Christ and many more gave me the needed understanding to get so much more out of my reading.

Jesus’ approach with the twelve should not surprise us. Before he turned these men loose on the world, he spent three years pouring his word into them.  Jesus spoke over 31,000 words in the gospels compared to the little more than 1,300 the apostles spoke.  The focus of the gospels is emphatically on Jesus’ in-depth teaching and on-the-job training.  Why? Because like the Ethiopian, like my Christian friend, and like me – they needed a teacher.

Two disciples were on the road to Emmaus.  They had come to believe that Jesus was the Messiah but now he had been crucified.  Following the resurrection they ran into Jesus, did not recognize him, and still believed that he was dead. Their hope had died with him, or so they thought (Luke 24:13-24).

Jesus responded, “’How foolish you are, and how slow to believe all that the prophets have spoken!  Did not the Messiah have to suffer these things and then enter his glory?’ And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he explained to them what was said in all the Scriptures concerning himself” (Lk. 24:25-27 NIV). Do you think from that point on those disciples ever read the Scriptures the same again?  It took the Teacher to open their eyes.

So, even the Bible indicates that for most daily Bible reading needs an assist.  That, along with other obstacles we have identified, are some of the problems that make daily Bible reading a “conundrum” for many Christians.  The final post will not offer a magic bullet. There are too many variables among individuals to give a one size fits all response.  However, it will offer some practical suggestions to help us be more consistent in getting into the Bible.  Once again, stay tuned for part three.